Staking Polygon Calculator
Resources Open Staking

Staking Polygon Calculator

A fee-aware rewards estimator for Polygon staking. The goal is realistic numbers: APR vs APY, validator commission, compounding frequency, and the hidden killer for small stakes: transaction costs.

Rewards estimator
Works as a sanity-check model (not a promise).
APR → net rewards → APY (if compounding)
Net APR (after commission)
—
Effective APY (with compounding)
—
Estimated rewards (period)
—
Net profit after fees (period)
—
Tip: if fees are a big % of rewards, reduce compounding frequency or increase stake size.
Start staking ›
Polygon staking visual
math

APR vs APY (and the exact calculator logic)

Most “staking calculator” pages fail because they ignore fees and commissions. This one models it in a simple, transparent way:

  • Net APR = APR × (1 − commission).
  • Gross rewards (year) = stake × netAPR.
  • APY (if compounding) ≈ (1 + netAPR / n)n − 1, where n is compounds per year.
  • Net profit = rewards − transaction fees (for the same time window).
Break-even: Compounding is only worth it if the extra rewards from compounding exceed the extra fees you pay to claim/restake.
scenarios

Realistic scenarios (what changes the result most)

Scenario Best move Why
Small stake + high fees Compound rarely (or never) Fees can eat the entire yield if you “micro-claim”
Large stake + stable validator Monthly/biweekly compounding Compounding becomes meaningful when fee % is low
High commission validator Switch to transparent, competitive fees Commission directly reduces net APR/compounding benefit
Unstable validator Prioritize uptime over tiny APR differences Downtime risk beats small headline yield changes
fees

Fee impact (the #1 mistake in staking math)

  • Approval + delegate cost: one-time setup costs (mostly relevant at start).
  • Claim/restake costs: these repeat — this is why compounding can be harmful for small stakes.
  • Withdraw/unbond costs: plan exit so you don’t get stuck without gas.
Practical rule: If your annual fees are more than ~10–20% of your expected annual rewards, compounding too often is usually a net negative.
links

Resources & References

Note: use resources for verification. For real staking actions, use official interfaces and double-check URLs.
faq

Staking Polygon Calculator FAQ

Short answers to the questions people actually search.

APR is the simple annual rate. APY assumes compounding (reinvesting rewards). APY is higher than APR only if compounding happens and fees don’t cancel it out.

Commission is taken from your rewards. A 5% commission reduces a 6% APR into ~5.7% net APR (before your transaction fees).

Only when the extra rewards from compounding are comfortably larger than the extra claim/restake fees. For small stakes, “less often” is usually better.

Because fees (approvals/claims/restakes) matter. If you stake a small amount and claim frequently, transaction fees can remove most of the yield.

No. Validator reliability, commission transparency, and fee impact often matter more than small APR differences. Realized yield is what counts.